skip to main content

Professional Regulation and Discipline

For professionals, including educators, health care professionals and their associations, the relationship with their governing college is crucial. Increasingly, professionals find themselves at the centre of complaints, which may stem in part from systemic inadequacies in our health and education institutions.

We ensure professionals seeking registration, facing complaints, or facing allegations of incompetence or incapacity before their governing College, are aware of their rights, and that those rights are fully protected throughout the process. Our lawyers make creative use of alternative dispute mechanisms offered by colleges. For foreign professionals, we have developed strategies to overcome barriers to recognition of their credentials. We also assist professional associations in their dealings with the colleges.

Our lawyers also provide prosecutorial services and independent legal counsel to professional colleges.

Our professional regulation and discipline services include:

  • submissions to Complaints and Executive Committees;
  • representation before Fitness to Practice Committees, Registration Committees and Discipline Committees;
  • representation on reviews to the Health Professions Appeal and Review Board;
  • court litigation arising from regulatory proceedings or practices;
  • representation at all related proceedings, such as inquests where a professional’s practice or right to practice may be challenged or circumscribed;
  • representation on Quality Assurance and Practice Reviews;
  • representation on OHIP reviews; and
  • policy and legal advice on professional governance, discipline issues and legislative reform.

Related Cases

Case/
30 April 2013

Douglas v. Canada

Douglas v. Canada (Attorney General), 2013 FC 451 In July 2010, Alexander Chapman filed a complaint with the Canadian Judicial Council (CJC), allegin...
Case/
13 December 2011

Slansky v. Canada

Slansky v. Canada (Attorney General), 2011 FC 1467 This is an appeal pursuant to Rule 51 of the Federal Courts Rules, SOR/98-106 [Rules] of a decision...
Case/
23 June 2010

Canadian Civil Liberties Association v. Toronto Police Service

Canadian Civil Liberties Association v. Toronto Police Service, 2010 ONSC 3525. Long Range Acoustical Devices (“LRAD”), colloquially descr...

Related Resources

News/16 January 2019

Cavalluzzo Wins Reinstatement and Damages for Employee Terminated for Misconduct Caused by Addiction

On January 10, 2019, Arbitrator Larry Steinberg released a decision in which he upheld ONA's grievance that a nurse suffering from an addiction, who h... Read More
Article/1 January 2005

Nurses' Rights and Responsibilities in Coroner Cases: A Guide for Nurses

Whenever there has been a death under unusual circumstances in a hospital or other health care institution, the Coroner undertakes an investigation in... Read More
Article/9 June 2001

Harris Government Legislates on Issues of Co-Instructional Activities, Instructional Time, Class Size and Length of Teachers Collective Agreements

On Tuesday 12 June 2001, the Harris Government introduced Bill 80, the Stability and Excellence in Education Act, 2001 for First Reading in the Legisl... Read More
Article/8 June 2001

Harris Government Legislates Mandatory Teacher Re-Certification

On Tuesday 12 June 2001, the Harris Government introduced Bill 80, the Stability and Excellence in Education Act, 2001 for First Reading in the Legisl... Read More
Article/1 January 2000

Strategies for Challenging Discriminatory Barriers to Foreign Credential Recognition

While the attraction and integration of skilled professionals and tradespersons to Canada is central to the success of Canadian immigration policy, th... Read More

Stay Updated

To receive email updates on legal developments and firm news and events, please sign up here.