Nov 8, 2021
Share with your friends and colleagues
Pick one or more destinations:

Bill 27 (Working for Workers Act, 2021): Ontario Introduces Legislation Affecting Workers’ Rights

The Ontario government has just introduced a new Bill affecting workers’ rights. Although not going nearly far enough to address abusive employer and recruiter conduct, Bill 27 (Working for Workers Act, 2021) responds to some of demands that workers have made for many years.

If passed, the legislation would strengthen regulation of migrant worker recruiters and temporary agencies, end non-compete agreements, improve access to washrooms for delivery workers and require employers to have policies about disconnecting during off-hours. While positive, there are significant gaps in the proposed legislation. As explained below, it is unlikely that Bill 27 will do much to improve working conditions, particularly since there is no indication when most of the key reforms would actually come into effect.

The province has also signalled it will increase the minimum wage to $15 with annual increases. Notably missing in the announcements so far is a commitment to ensuring that workers have paid sick days.

The Bill proposes changes on the following topics, which are explained in more detail below:

  • Regulating Recruiters and Temporary Agencies
  • Eliminating Barriers to Non-Health Professions and Trades
  • Collecting Information About Agricultural Workplaces
  • Requirement for a “Disconnecting from Work” Policy
  • Prohibiting Non-Compete Agreements
  • Delivery Worker Access to Washrooms
  • Changes to the Workers’ Safety and Insurance Board

Regulating Recruiters and Temporary Agencies

One of the most significant aspects of the Bill is the introduction of new legal obligations for recruiters and temporary help agencies.

“Recruiters” are individuals or companies that offer to assist migrant workers to come to Canada for work. As groups like Migrant Workers Alliance for Change have documented, migrant workers can pay thousands of dollars in fees to unscrupulous recruiters and agencies, both overseas and in Canada. Often when the workers arrive, their working conditions and wages are not as promised or agreed to.

In 2009, the province passed the Employment Protection for Foreign Nationals Act, making it illegal for recruiters and employers to charge recruitment fees. But the Act has lacked the teeth needed to enforce it and abusive recruitment practices have continued. Recruitment agencies have established subcontracting relationships to shield themselves from liability.

Abusive conduct by temporary agencies is also well documented, including wage theft, unsafe work, and illegal recruitment fees. Many temporary agencies operate through a web of companies to protect their true owners from identification and liability.

Bill 27 finally promises some accountability for recruitment and temporary help agencies, including:

  • Mandatory licensing of recruiters and temporary help agencies. Employers engaging the services of recruiters/temporary help agencies will be prohibited from knowingly using the services of unlicensed recruiters and temporary help agencies (although there are no penalties or fines if they do so). The Director of Employment Standards will have the ability to suspend or revoke licenses.
  • A new requirement that recruiters and temporary help agencies disclose the identity of sub-contractors, which may address problems arising from the web of corporations recruiters and temporary help agencies use to avoid legal liability.
  • New requirements for recruiters and temporary help agencies to document work assignments and hours of work, which will assist workers in proving when they have been underpaid or had other rights violated.
  • Corporate directors of recruitment agencies will be jointly and severally liable for illegal recruitment fees of subcontractors.
  • The Bill will expand the prohibitions on reprisals to protect workers seeking to enforce rights involving recruiters. In a welcome move, the burden of proof will be on the recruiter to prove they did not engage in a reprisal is on the recruiter.

While a positive step, the Bill has serious weaknesses. When it comes to illegal conduct by recruiters, the Bill does not make employers liable for recruitment fees. To really ensure workers can get back the illegal fees they paid, the employer must be held liable. If employers are responsible, they will have an incentive to make sure they use recruiters that do not charge illegal fees.

With respect to temporary agency workers, the Workers Action Centre and Parkdale Community Legal Services argue that effective protections for temporary agency workers will require steps such as: making companies financially responsible under WSIB for the death and injuries of temporary agency workers and ensuring all temporary agency workers earn the same wages as directly-hired workers when they do the same work.

And ultimately, Bill 27 does nothing to address the serious barriers migrant and temporary workers face to unionizing. Without the collective power gained through unionization, it will be difficult for workers in such precarious situations to enforce what minimal rights they have.

Eliminating Barriers to Non-Health Professions and Trades

Migrants identify many barriers to finding jobs that correspond to their education, skills and experience, including employers not recognizing their credentials and experience. Language proficiency and “Canadian experience” requirements are often irrelevant to the actual job and operate as thinly veiled racist exclusions. The Ontario Human Rights Commission has formally taken the position that a strict requirement for “Canadian experience” is prima facie discrimination.

The province has indicated that it will be considering amendments to the Fair Access to Regulated Health Professions Act, 2006. Bill 27 will give government some tools to eliminate such discriminatory requirements for registration with the bodies that regulate professions and trades. Most significantly, the Bill proposes to prohibit a regulated profession from requiring “Canadian Experience” as a qualification for registration, subject to exemptions for health and safety reasons which may be determined by regulation. The government also proposes to implement rules about the level of language proficiency required to enter the professions and trades, although the details of these requirements remain to be determined in future regulations.

Collecting Information about Agricultural Workplaces

Schedule 4 of the Bill is lauded by the government as enhancing coordination of services such as vaccination and testing at agricultural workplaces. As the pandemic has highlighted, the working conditions for migrant agricultural workers place them at great risk of infectious diseases such as COVID-19. Indeed, the generally unsafe and exploitative working conditions for such workers have been well documented over many years.

Bill 27 does nothing to change that reality. It simply allows the Minister of Agriculture to collect information related to temporary foreign agricultural workers and to establish policies and make recommendations related to agriculture, food and rural affairs.

Requirement for a “Disconnecting from Work” Policy

If Bill 27 is passed into law, employers with 25 or more employees will be required to have a written policy with respect to disconnecting from work. The Bill defines “Disconnecting from work” to mean “not engaging in work-related communications, including emails, telephone calls, video calls or the sending or reviewing of other messages, so as to be free from the performance of work.”

The Bill has no other requirements, such as setting minimum standards for how long in each work day workers have the right to disconnect. It leaves such details to be determined at some point in the future by regulation.

In a backgrounder, the Ministry of Labour suggests the polices could include expectations about response time for emails and encouraging employees to turn on out-of-office notifications when they are not working. Needless to say, such minimal “disconnection” requirements would not deliver the promise to “help employees spend more time with their families.”

Prohibiting Non-Compete Agreements

Bill 27 would amend the Employment Standards Act, 2000  to prohibit employers from entering into employment contracts with employees that are or include a non-compete agreement. These are agreements that prevent employees from leaving their job to work for a competitor or to start their own competing business within a specified timeframe and/or geographic area.

As most such non-competition agreements and contract clauses are not enforceable anyway, particularly for low wage workers, the Bill would alter very little while giving the impression that the government is doing something to help workers. The province is aware that employers use these unenforceable clauses to “intimidate” workers. It is difficult to see how that will change under this Bill.

Delivery Worker Access to Washrooms

The Bill proposes to amend the Occupational Health and Safety Act to require business owners to allow delivery workers to use a company’s washroom if they are delivering or picking up items (with some exceptions, such as for health, safety and security reasons).

The provincial government has pitched this amendment as supporting “the delivery drivers, couriers and truck drivers who have kept our essential supplies and economy going through the pandemic.” Access to washroom is no doubt necessary for the health and safety of delivery workers. It should be noted, however, that this Bill does not touch any of the demands made by delivery workers in the “Gig Workers’ Bill of Rights”, such as effective rights to unionize, full employment rights, payment for all hours of work, and coverage under injured workers compensation law.

Workers’ Compensation

In 2010, in response to concerns about its unfunded liability, the WSIB embarked on a transformation of its business model to reduce its costs. The transformation dramatically reduced the WSIB’s unfunded liability. But advocates and health care professionals have argued that reduction came at a cost to injured workers: by routinely disregarding medical evidence; forcing workers back to work before they were medically fit; cutting compensation benefits and denying entitlement to health care treatments.

With the Board now in good financial health, Bill 27 will make several changes to the Workplace Safety and Insurance Act.  However, rather then improving benefits and services to workers, the Bill will redistribute money to employers if the insurance fund is over a target amount the Board may be required to distribute money to “safe” employers. The Ministry estimates that a significant portion of the Board’s $6.1 billion reserve would be distributed to employers. This would be on top of the $168 million premium cut in 2022.

These amendments will exacerbate the financial incentives that already exist for employers to challenge worker claims for entitlement, contributing further to undermining the workers’ compensation system.

The Bill will also allow the Board to enter into an agreement with “any person or entity” for the purpose of administering certain employer obligations, such as remittances. A government backgrounder explains that this change will enable the Board “to work with entities, like the Canada Revenue Agency, to streamline remittances for businesses, and facilitating an efficient one-stop-shop for submitting premiums and payroll deductions.” Note, however, that the language of the Bill is broad enough to allow for privatization of the administration of a great deal of the Board’s processes related to employer premium obligations and remittances.

Next Steps

Bill 27 has passed second reading in the provincial legislature and will now move through the legislative process, including for consideration by the Standing Committee on Social Policy. It is likely that amendments will be made before the Bill becomes law.

Stay tuned to the Cavalluzzo website for updates as the process unfolds.

Related Blogs

Blog/15 March 2024

Unionized Employees in Ontario Can Pursue Individual Human Rights Claims at Tribunal

The Ontario Divisional Court confirms the Ontario Human Rights Tribunal's concurrent jurisdiction with labour arbitrators

In its recent decision London District Catholic School Board v Weilgosh, 2023 ONSC 3857, the Ontario Divisional Court has confirmed that unionized emp...
Blog/12 February 2024

Ontario Court of Appeal Confirms Bill 124 Violates Unionized Workers’ Right to Collective Bargaining

ONCA affirms win for unionized workers in dismissing government's appeal

The Court of Appeal has dismissed the government of Ontario’s appeal of the Superior Court’s decision to strike down Bill 124 as unconstitutional in r...
Blog/25 January 2024

Employment Equity Act Task Force Report

In late 2023 the federal Employment Equity Act Task Force released a report titled A Transformative Framework to Achieve and Sustain Employment Equity...