Supreme Court of Canada Restores Voting Rights to Canadians Overseas

News/
11 January 2019
Share
Share with your friends and colleagues
Pick one or more destinations:

In Frank v. Canada (Attorney General), the Supreme Court of Canada ruled that certain provisions of the Canada Elections Act unconstitutionally denied Canadian citizens who have lived abroad for five or more years the right to vote. The Attorney General conceded that limiting overseas voters' rights in this way violated s. 3 of the Charter, and the Court held that the violation could not be saved under s. 1.

The Court found that the distinction between voters who had lived abroad for less than five years (and were therefore eligible to vote) and voters who had lived abroad for five or move years (and were not eligible) was an arbitrary and impermissible distinction. Chief Justice Wagner wrote, "the measure improperly applies to many individuals with deep and abiding connections to Canada and to Canadian laws, and that it does so in a manner that is far broader than necessary to achieve the electoral fairness objective advanced by the [Attorney General of Canada]. The disenfranchisement of these citizens not only denies them a fundamental democratic right, but also comes at the expense of their sense of self-worth and their dignity. These deleterious effects far outweigh any speculative benefits that the measure might bring about."

Cavalluzzo, led by former partner Shaun O'Brien and partner Amanda Darrach, represented the appellants, Gillian Frank and Jamie Duong, at the Supreme Court. We commend their persistence and dedication to this important battle for voting rights.

 

Recent News

News/11 May 2023

"Appellate court ruling a reminder to check employment contracts"

Jeff Andrew comments on changes in employment contracts

In today's Legal Matters, Jeff Andrew discusses how some employment contracts signed years ago may no longer be valid, if an employee's duties, or the... Read More
News/23 February 2023

Stephen Moreau Interviewed by HR Reporter

Article focuses on 'real uncertainty' around terminations

Stephen Moreau was recently interviewed in an article in HR Reporter titled What ‘exceptional circumstances’ push reasonable notice past 24 months? Read More
News/13 February 2023

"No Clear Answers As To When Longer Notice Periods Are Required"

Stephen Moreau discusses notice periods with Legal Matters

In today's Legal Matters, Stephen Moreau discusses the continued uncertainty as to what constitutes “exceptional circumstances” that would require an ... Read More