Administrative Law

Administrative tribunals have replaced the courts as the most common forum for citizens and organizations to seek justice and vindicate their rights. Labour boards, arbitration boards, human rights commissions, pension commissions, commissions of inquiry and professional regulatory bodies – these are just some of the many tribunals in which we advocate for our clients' rights. We also act for clients in judicial review and appeal proceedings before provincial and federal courts and the Supreme Court of Canada. Cavalluzzo also advises administrative agencies, regulators and tribunals on administrative law and practices.

Notable administrative representations include:

  • Canada (Attorney General) v. Hunter, in which the Firm represented Kimberly Hunter as a respondent at the Federal Court of Appeal. Canada sought judicial review of a decision holding that Ms. Hunter was entitled to EI parental benefits as a guardian of a child placed in her care for the purpose of adoption. The Court of Appeal held that the award of benefits was reasonable and dismissed the appeal. The EI adjudicative process was subsequently altered as a result of this ground-breaking decision.
  • Canadian Union of Postal Workers v. Canada Post Corporation, in which the Federal Court of Appeal considered the Canadian Union of Postal Workers' ("CUPW") appeal for judicial review of an Occupational Health and Safety Tribunal decision. That decision found that Canada Post was not obligated to ensure that all areas outside the physical Canada Post building are inspected annually. The Court of Appeal reversed the tribunal, agreeing with CUPW and holding that the Tribunal's decision was unreasonable.
  • R. v. Conway, in which the Supreme Court of Canada considered the Ontario Review Board's determination that it did not have jurisdiction to grant Mr. Conway, who was detained in a mental health centre, an absolute discharge, among other relief he was seeking. The Supreme Court agreed with the Board that it did not have the jurisdiction under its authorising statute to grant absolute discharge or order treatment. The Firm represented the Ontario Review Board.
  • Canada (Transport) v. Canadian Union of Public Employees, in which the Firm represented the Canadian Union of Public Employees at the Federal Court of Appeal. The Court reviewed Transport Canada's approval of an amendment to Sunwing Airline's evacuation protocol and held that it was not reasonable. Transport Canada had provided insufficient evidence that it had properly evaluated whether the amendment would compromise passenger or crew safety.
  • Zulkoskey v. Canada (Employment and Social Development), in which the Firm represented Tania Zulkoskey at the Federal Court of Appeal. Ms. Zulkoskey sought relief from the Canadian Human Rights Commission's dismissal of her complaint, which alleged that the government's denial of two sets of EI benefits for a couple with twins was discriminatory on the basis of family status. The Court held that the Commission's decision was unreasonable and allowed Ms. Zulkoskey's appeal.

Related Cases

Case/
27 November 2018

2130869 Ont. Ltd. v. Universal Workers Union

2130869 Ont. Ltd. v. Universal Workers Union, 2013 ONSC 1593 (Div. Ct.) This is an application for judicial review of a series of decisions of the Ont...
Case/
14 June 2018

Canada (Canadian Human Rights Commission) v. Canada (Attorney General), [2018] 2 SCR 230, 2018 SCC 31 (CanLII)

Canada (Canadian Human Rights Commission) v. Canada (Attorney General), [2018] 2 SCR 230, 2018 SCC 31 (CanLII)
Case/
6 April 2018

Toronto Star v. Attorney General of Ontario

Paul Cavalluzzo, Adrienne Telford and Tyler Boggs acted for Laborers' International Union of North America and LIUNA Local 183 in Toronto Star v. Atto...
Case/
2 February 2018

Williams Lake Indian Band v. Canada (Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development)

Paul Cavalluzzo and Adrienne Telford acted for the Intervener the Specific Claims Tribunal in Williams Lake Indian Band v Canada (Aboriginal Affairs a...
Case/
4 August 2017

Canada (Transport) v. Canadian Union of Public Employees, 2017 FCA 164 (CanLII)

Canada (Transport) v. Canadian Union of Public Employees, 2017 FCA 164 (CanLII)
Case/
6 June 2017

Canada Post Corporation v. Canadian Union of Postal Workers

Paul Cavalluzzo and Adrienne Telford acted for the Canadian Union of Postal Workers in Canada Post v Canadian Union of Postal Workers.

Related Resources

News/26 August 2021

Eleven Cavalluzzo Lawyers Recognized in Best Lawyers 2022 Edition

Eleven Cavalluzzo Lawyers Recognized in Best Lawyers 2022 Edition, and Cavalluzzo LLP also been name...
News/4 February 2021

Cavalluzzo LLP Secures Major Win for Employees of the Bankrupt Aveos Company

On February 3, 2021, the Federal Court issued a decision that puts an end to a long and unfortunate ...
News/28 January 2021

New Partner Announcement

Cavalluzzo LLP is very pleased to announce that Niiti Simmonds and Michael Mandarino have joined our...
Event/12 June 2019

Michael Wright Speaks at Law Society's Six-Minute Business Lawyer Conference

Michael Wright speaks at the Law Society of Ontario's Six-Minute Business Lawyer  Conference, 2...
Blog/15 March 2021

Federal Court Approves $1.9 Million Settlement in Bernlohr c. Anciens employés d’Aveos Performance Aéronautique Inc

Cavalluzzo Lawyers represented former Aveos employees who had been denied wages, vacation pay, and severance pay when the large aircraft maintenance company filed for bankruptcy

The Federal Court approved a class settlement in the amount of $1.9 million in Bernlohr c. Anciens employés d’Aveos Performance Aéronautique Inc. This...
Blog/15 March 2021

Federal Court Approves $1.9 Million Settlement in Bernlohr c. Anciens employés d’Aveos Performance Aéronautique Inc

Cavalluzzo Lawyers represented former Aveos employees who had been denied wages, vacation pay, and severance pay when the large aircraft maintenance company filed for bankruptcy

The Federal Court approved a class settlement in the amount of $1.9 million in Bernlohr c. Anciens employés d’Aveos Performance Aéronautique Inc. This...
Blog/12 December 2018

ONA Successfully Challenges Unreasonable Vaccinate or Mask Policy in ONA v St. Michael’s Hospital

In ONA v St. Michael’s Hospital, Arbitrator Kaplan upheld a grievance filed by the Ontario Nurses’ Association (“ONA”) alleging that the introduction ...
News/26 August 2021

Eleven Cavalluzzo Lawyers Recognized in Best Lawyers 2022 Edition

Cavalluzzo LLP also been named “Law Firm of the Year”

Eleven Cavalluzzo Lawyers Recognized in Best Lawyers 2022 Edition, and Cavalluzzo LLP also been named “Law Firm of the Year” expertise in Labour and E...
News/4 February 2021

Cavalluzzo LLP Secures Major Win for Employees of the Bankrupt Aveos Company

The End of a Long Saga

On February 3, 2021, the Federal Court issued a decision that puts an end to a long and unfortunate saga. In 2012, a large aircraft maintenance compan...
News/28 January 2021

New Partner Announcement

Cavalluzzo LLP is very pleased to announce that Niiti Simmonds and Michael Mandarino have joined our partnership.

Cavalluzzo LLP is very pleased to announce that Niiti Simmonds and Michael Mandarino have joined our partnership. We wish them both ongoing success as...
News/14 May 2019

The Lawyer's Daily: "Ontario Goes Beyond Common Law in Proposed Crown Liability Act"

On May 13, 2019, Stephen Moreau and Lara Koerner-Yeo’s commentary on Ontario’s proposed Crown Liability and Proceedings Act, 2019 (CLAPA) ...
News/1 May 2019

Historic Charter Equality Rights Win for Women Working in Nursing Homes in Ontario Divisional Court

On April 30, 2019, women who work in female-dominated workplaces won a significant and historic Charter equality rights victory in an appeal to the Di...
News/11 January 2019

CUPW in the Supreme Court of Canada

On December 10,2018, Paul Cavalluzzo and Adrienne Telford appeared on behalf of CUPW at the Supreme Court of Canada in Canada Post Corp v Canadian Un...
Event/Jun 12, 2019

Michael Wright Speaks at Law Society's Six-Minute Business Lawyer Conference

Michael Wright speaks at the Law Society of Ontario's Six-Minute Business Lawyer  Conference, 2019. He will be speaking about the enforceability ...
Publication/6 October 2014

Special Evidentiary Issues in Administrative Law

"Special Evidentiary Issues in Administrative Law," 31 The Advocates Journal, No. 3, p. 20 (2012)
Publication/6 October 2014

Advocacy Before Administrative Tribunals

"Advocacy Before Administrative Tribunals", co-author with Leslie McIntosh, chapter in book edited by L. Sossin and C. Flood,  Administrative Law...
Publication/6 October 2014

Hot Tubs and Concurrent Evidence: Improving Administrative Proceedings, 25 Canadian Journal of Administrative Law and Practice 79 (2012)

Hot Tubs and Concurrent Evidence: Improving Administrative Proceedings, 25 Canadian Journal of Administrative Law and Practice 79 (2012)
Publication/6 October 2014

Active Adjudication or Entering the Arena: How Much is Too Much?

Originally published in the Canadian Journal of Administrative Law & Practice - Volume 24. Administrative proceedings are generally more flexible...
Publication/20 February 2013

Applying the Charter in Everyday Administrative Decision-Making

Freya Kristjanson & Nadia Lambek, "Applying the Charter in Everyday Administrative Decision-Making", Canadian Journal of Administrative Law and Pr...
Publication/2 July 2012

Regulatory Negligence and Administrative Law

The law of negligence has been a growth industry for lawyers since the Donoghue v. Stevenson decision. While defining its contours has always been a d...