skip to main content

Employment Law and Litigation

The courts can be a powerful tool for workers and organizations seeking to enforce their legal rights. At Cavalluzzo, our civil litigators have assisted unions, individual employees, associations, professionals, pension plans, investors, benefit trust funds and other organizations in advancing their interests through a range of creative and important litigation in the courts.

Our lawyers also advise individual non-unionized employees at every stage of the employment relationship: from reviewing an offer of employment to wrongful dismissal. We represent employees from all walks of life, including the financial services industry, manufacturing, public service, the health and education sectors.

Our lawyers have experience negotiating with and litigating against major boards, utility companies, non-profit organizations and IT firms. Our employment law practise spans the country and is multi-national: we represent people with employment law issues connected to Canada working around the World. 

Our employment advice and advocacy includes:

  • advising and litigating wrongful dismissal and constructive dismissal claims, including class actions;
  • enforcing Ontario and Federal legislation on collective bargaining, employment standards, human rights, occupational health and safety, workers compensation;
  • advising on human rights compliance, including pay and employment equity plans for workplaces and alternative dispute resolution measures;
  • reviewing and negotiating severance "packages" on termination;
  • preparing and negotiating employment contracts;
  • advising employees on workplace obligations including confidentiality and fiduciary obligations;
  • defending employees against ex-employers alleging breach of restrictive covenants, such as non-compete and non-solicitation clauses;
  • acting for unions in strike and lockout injunction litigation;
  • representing employees and unions in bankruptcy and insolvency trusteeship proceedings; and
  • prosecuting litigation against government entities that abuse their authority.

Notable representations include:

  • Michela v. St. Thomas of Villanova Catholic School, which involved three teachers' wrongful dismissal claims. The school argued that its financial circumstances should be considered when determining reasonable notice. The Court of Appeal disagreed, holding that an employer's financial circumstances are not relevant to the determination of reasonable notice. Michela is now one of the leading wrongful dismissal decisions in Canada, and appears to have ended a thirty-year debate as to whether an employer's financial picture is relevant in wrongful dismissal cases.
  • Oliveira v. Aviva Canada Inc., which is the first Canadian case to consider an insurer's obligations in the face of ever-increasing attempts to hold employees liable for privacy breaches, in which the Firm represented a nurse who had been sued by a patient for alleged breaches of privacy in the workplace. The nurse sought coverage and legal defence from her insurer, which refused. The Superior Court held that the insurer was obligated to defend the claim. The Court of Appeal agreed.
  • Horne v. Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre, in which Dr. Gabrielle Horne, a cardiologist and research scientist, alleged that the hospital, among others, wrongfully varied her privileges on an emergency basis, causing substantial damage to her reputation and her career as a researcher.  After an eight-week jury trial, the jury found that the hospital had acted in bad faith and awarded Dr. Horne $1.4 million in reputation damages. The Nova Scotia Court of Appeal upheld the jury's finding of bad faith, but reduced the damages award, which remains the largest award of reputation damages in Canada outside for a non-defamation claim.
  • McMichael v The New Zealand & Australian Lamb Company, in which the Court awarded 22 months' notice to a senior executive with 12 years' service. This decision is notable for the complex cross-border issues raised, as the plaintiff was employed by a US company headquartered in Connecticut, was working in California, but had an employment agreement governed by Ontario law.
  • Legg v. Simcoe Muskoka Catholic District School Board, in which the Court of Appeal for Ontario considered whether an indemnification clause in an employee agreement was enforceable against the employer in connection with legal fees incurred as a result of an internal investigation. Cavalluzzo won a significant victory for Ms. Legg in one of the only reported decisions in Canada concerning these clauses.
  • Partridge v. Botony Dental Corporation, in which the Court of Appeal considered whether the employer had wrongfully dissed our client, a dental hygienist, when it refused to return her to her original position upon returning from maternity leave, deliberately increased her work to conflict with her child care obligations and then purported to terminate her employment for cause. The Court of Appeal agreed with the Superior Court's decision that the employer had no evidence to support its allegations of cause and award of 12 months' reasonable notice damages and human rights damages.
  • Fioravanti v. OLG, in which Cavalluzzo acted for Ontario Lottery and Gaming Corporation's former General Counsel, and one of its most senior executives.  Cavalluzzo was entirely successful on the question of OLG's liability to this executive concerning his exit agreement with the company.

Ongoing Class Actions

Last Modified: 1 February 2019

Uber Class Action

Cavalluzzo is co-counsel with Samfiru Tumarkin LLP in a proposed class action against Uber Technologies Inc. and related companies (collectively "Uber...
Last Modified: 1 February 2019

Blyth Academy Class Action

If you work or worked at Blyth Academy teaching courses there, you might benefit from the Class Action.  We encourage you to fill out the form fo...
Last Modified: 8 January 2019

Factual Television Class Actions

Class action lawsuits are being contemplated against factual television producers.   If you work or worked for Cineflix, Insight Productions, Boa...
Last Modified: 21 December 2018

CTS of Canada Plant Closure Action

On behalf of three class plaintiffs, Cavalluzzo LLP has filed a class action against CTS of Canada, a Canadian automotive parts manufacturer operating...

Completed Class Actions

Last Modified: 21 December 2018

Ontario Government Retiree Benefits Case

Our firm commenced an action against the Ontario government with respect to its decision to reduce the health, dental and other benefits of approximat...
Last Modified: 21 December 2018

Krones Machinery Co. Ltd.

This is an action which was initiated with respect to the closure of this manufacturing facility in Brampton, Ontario.
Last Modified: 21 December 2018

Viskase Companies Inc. and Viskase Canada Inc.

A settlement was reached reinstating paid life insurance coverage and compensating certain class members for the loss of their other paid benefits.
Last Modified: 21 December 2018

North Shore Catholic District School Board

When mutual insurance companies “demutualized” several years ago, a number of employers received substantial benefits as a result of the g...
Last Modified: 21 December 2018

Johnson Controls Inc.

This action was commenced on April 16, 2010 after Johnson Controls Inc. announced that it was closing its manufacturing plant in Orangeville, Ontario ...
Last Modified: 21 December 2018

Ontario Nurses' Association CCAC Pension Action

For current and former ONA members who worked for municipalities or home care services between 1996-1998, whether you were an ONA member or not when y...

Related Cases

Case/
12 November 2018

Ministry of Correctional Services v. McKinnon

Ministry of Correctional Services v. McKinnon, 2010 ONSC 3896 (Div. Ct.) This is an application for judicial review brought by the Ministry of Correct...
Case/
2 May 2014

Canada (Attorney General) v. Johnstone

Canada (Attorney General) v. Johnstone, 2014 FCA 110 (leading case on employer’s obligations to accommodate employees on the basis of family sta...
Case/
1 January 2014

College of Nurses of Ontario v. XX

College of Nurses of Ontario v. XX (constitutional and human rights challenge to statutory regime regulating nurses diagnosed with mental illness...
Case/
8 October 2013

Kranjcec v. Ontario

Class action regarding retiree benefits.
Case/
26 September 2013

Timmins and District Hospital v. Ontario Nurses’ Association

Timmins and District Hospital v. Ontario Nurses’ Association, 2013 ONSC 6002 (judicial review of labour arbitration award regarding long-term di...
Case/
14 March 2013

2130869 Ont. Ltd. v. Universal Workers Union

2130869 Ont. Ltd. v. Universal Workers Union, 2013 ONSC 1593 (Div. Ct.) This is an application for judicial review of a series of decisions of the Ont...

Related Resources

Event/23 February 2019

Danielle Bisnar Speaks at Federation of Asian Canadian Lawyers Annual Conference

Danielle Bisnar speaks at the Federation of Asian Canadian Lawyers Annual Conference. She will be pa...
Firm News/12 February 2019

Tassia Poynter quoted in Law Times

Tassia Poynter was quoted in the January 28, 2019 edition of Law Times regarding a recently proposed...
News/14 January 2019

Advocate Daily: "Ride Sharing Class Action Back on Track Despite Province Bailing"

Advocate Daily: "Ride Sharing Class Action Back on Track Despite Province Bailing"
News/9 January 2019

Uber Class Action Featured on the CBC Podcast 'Front Burner'

Listen here to an interesting discussion of what the Court of Appeal's recent decision in ...
News/8 January 2019

Uber Class Action in the News

A copy of a recent  Wall Street Journal article " Canadian Courts Slams Uber Arbitrat...
News/2 January 2019

Big Victory for Uber Drivers at Ontario Court of Appeal

On January 2, 2019, the Court of Appeal issued its decision reversing the motion court’s decis...
News/12 February 2019

Tassia Poynter quoted in Law Times

Tassia Poynter was quoted in the January 28, 2019 edition of Law Times regarding a recently proposed class action lawsuit alleging that television pro... Read More
News/14 January 2019

Advocate Daily: "Ride Sharing Class Action Back on Track Despite Province Bailing"

Advocate Daily: "Ride Sharing Class Action Back on Track Despite Province Bailing" Read More
News/9 January 2019

Uber Class Action Featured on the CBC Podcast 'Front Burner'

Listen here to an interesting discussion of what the Court of Appeal's recent decision in Heller v Uber Technologies Inc. means for drivers ... Read More
News/8 January 2019

Uber Class Action in the News

A copy of a recent  Wall Street Journal article " Canadian Courts Slams Uber Arbitration Process" can be read here, and CBC's... Read More
News/2 January 2019

Big Victory for Uber Drivers at Ontario Court of Appeal

On January 2, 2019, the Court of Appeal issued its decision reversing the motion court’s decision to stay a proposed class action on behalf of U... Read More
News/28 December 2018

Advocate Daily: "Theft Motivated by Addiction not Necessarily a Firing Offence"

Advocate Daily:  "Theft Motivated by Addiction not Necessarily a Firing Offence" Read More
Event/Feb 23, 2019: 02:30 - 05:30

Danielle Bisnar Speaks at Federation of Asian Canadian Lawyers Annual Conference

Danielle Bisnar speaks at the Federation of Asian Canadian Lawyers Annual Conference. She will be participating in a panel on Top Employment and Labou...

Stay Updated

To receive email updates on legal developments and firm news and events, please sign up here.